InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Plowmaster

11/08/19 5:33 PM

#262688 RE: Sheepdog #262687

Due diligence says otherwise. Why is it I see that attack on Roger, but its never supported? I look and asked around but not ONCE in over 2 years of asking, can anyone produce support for the statement. Due diligence shows Roger integral for the growth.

There would be none of the growth, no self publishing, none of it without Roger. There is a ton of DD to support this.

So, if there is DD to support that statement attacking Roger, it has NEVER been shown.

Also, the 'spending money like candy.' That's 100% false bullshit as well with zero support. Just pure shit rhetoric.

$FUNN
icon url

TheGreatGreenRush

11/08/19 6:05 PM

#262696 RE: Sheepdog #262687

Why did Ben need financing if everything was so fine and dandy?
icon url

TheGreatGreenRush

11/08/19 6:06 PM

#262697 RE: Sheepdog #262687

Why was Ben in such dire straights? I mean he bumped into Roger right? Must’ve liked what he said