Replies to post #54994 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[FORTUNE500]

gdb81 and Rocky, very good posting. I dident know either of what you posted but it goes along with my recent revelation that the Russian contract WAS NOT 'binding' as was proclaimed in the PR's by Huff. You see, one can fault me for staying in GTEM too long and loseing money but when I'm told in a nationally released PR that the contract is 'binding', whose fault is that? All we can do when we buy a stock is trust that a PR is accurate and the people in charge, honest. In this case, it looks bad for GTEM and the SEC investigation. Anyway, you guys keep digging. We need the truth.

[nerd86]

gdb knock yourself out. Here is the latest SEC position on Material Event Reporting.

http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8400.htm