My point is that a 70% drop in one stock is the same financial loss as a 70% loss in another stock to the shareholder with the same investment in both. Declaring that Canb cannot be a dominant player because it dropped 70%, would equate to saying CVSI is not a dominant player since they also dropped 70% in share price.
But thank you for pointing out that 70% of $100k os less than 70% than a billion, along with the other obvious stuff. I don't think anyone knew that.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
