InvestorsHub Logo

flipper44

10/23/19 9:48 PM

#248770 RE: exwannabe #248768

It may not be the same room; however, it's pretty close.

I'll be glad if DCVax-L adds to the arsenal against cancer. I'll be gone if it is just another Optune (Statistical Manipulation).

I'm still persuaded DCVax-L is part of the solution. Hoping we see results soon. I'm OK with complicated results, I'm not OK if they pull the wool over regulator eyes during the approval process-- the latter exemplified by NVCR.

It still amazes me that good people were befuddled by Optune "data."

TiltMyBrain

10/23/19 9:49 PM

#248771 RE: exwannabe #248768

And people running a scam to destroy a company trying to cure a deadly disease.

How many patients still alive after all these years???


https://www.scribd.com/document/411229128/A-Dendritic-Cell-Cancer-Vaccine-Shines-Brighter-for-Glioblastoma-Patients

X Master

10/23/19 10:01 PM

#248774 RE: exwannabe #248768

Perhaps a review of the blinded data is in order. Your statements are the ones that are misleading. The OS is AMAZING when compared to the SOC.

CherryTree1

10/24/19 2:41 PM

#248871 RE: exwannabe #248768

I would agree with you if it were people that knew for certain that DCVAX failed and were encouraging people to invest in false hopes then there should be a special place in h3ll for them too. . . but that is not really the case now is it. They don't know that end result and are encouraged by the still blinded data that has been released that is encouraging and exciting looking extremely positive. That is far different from the thugs that have been engaged relentlessly working to bankrupt NWBO completely independent of whether or not DCVAX proves effective or not . . . and even worse I have to believe some well recognize and have for a long time the potential, highly effective without dire chemo-side effects and that DCVAX is looking better and better, more and more like it will be approved each day.

Doc logic

10/27/19 5:24 PM

#249111 RE: exwannabe #248768

exwannabe,

I think you want to confuse intentional fouls with deliberate scamming. Intentional fouls are part of the game. I don't like it but it's part of many games. It happens in basketball, football, soccer etc. If disadvantaged you take a foul instead of potentially lose the game. Linda and Les have taken lots of fouls for the team and investors who have not understood how to work around this have been hurt badly. You have read what biosectinvestor has written about risk with investing in this sector as regarding deliberate attacks and the inevitable dilution. I have stated that Linda would do whatever necessary to get this to the finish line. There is a big difference between a scam company and one struggling to survive overwhelming odds and taking fouls along the way to do so. I challenge you to make this a clear distinction and provide examples of both types of companies and then make an honest assessment of what NWBO has done to date to get to this point as compared to the companies you highlight. Best wishes.