InvestorsHub Logo

TheLastOneSitting

10/15/19 5:24 PM

#10634 RE: mckvee #10632

Those are fair and valid points backed with thought, logic, and experience. I would love to see more posts like this positive or negative, that would then spur healthy debate, sharing of insights, DD/research and the like. However that is not what is happening, at this point we have the ravings of a lunatic talking about complete nonsense that's either outright wrong or based on pure emotion.

You refer to it as shareholders being "negative and impatient" but that is not what I or the many other posters who have spoken up are tired of, its the hissyfits of a child who didn't get his way that makes this board insufferable. And to be honest, you share in that blame for egging him on.

GrandeS has posted many times about his experience in healthcare, I can't imagine how much insight he could share from his experience to help those who do not understand how business or healthcare works but instead of tapping into that knowledge with intelligent conversation we are forced to read redundant banter about "another day without a PR" all day everyday.

I continue to do research on ALRT, competitors, diabetes, healthcare, payers, governments, reach out to the company, and everything else that could be relevant to ALRT, and I believe I too (like GrandeS and others) could share a lot of useful information, but I've all but given up posting here as it falls on deaf ears.

Those that understand what they are invested in will continue to be shareholders long after the childish shareholders who are mad they aren't rich yet are gone.

Have you ever asked yourself why there is a 90,000,000 float and zero volume? Who holds all those shares and why aren't they trading them or posting on this board? Maybe they understand what they are invested in and see the big picture? Maybe they understand that it is not ihub money that will make this a dollar stock and that ALRT is not targeting mom and pop shops so deals aren't made in a day?If only there was a place we could discuss these things...

GrandeS

10/15/19 5:32 PM

#10635 RE: mckvee #10632

nice try in defending your buddy. The majority of his messages are derogatory, and some have been clearly racist. We all question company decisions and lack of progress. That's definitely part of the investing analyses process. It's the continued multi-daily belligerent comments with no basis and certainly no understanding of the issues that the company with FDA cleared technology has to hurdle and weave through. It is painful to watch this guy do this to himself every day.
I'll not make excuses for ALRT but I've been in this space for years and change comes so slowly. LVGO is different because it's patient centric, fewer barriers to entry. But I'm glad ALRT is not patient centric. IMO ALRT is set for long term growth whereas LVGO has limited growth potential in the diabetes segment. In two years I estimate ALRT will have 5 times more diabetes patients on their platform than LVGO will have.