Replies to post #49206 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[prototype_101]

Gates, that's exactly what I think, we just entered the "zone" where deals can get done based on successful R/T, the probability goes higher as 2000 hours goes successfully to 2500/3000/etc, that's why I believe deals may very well be inked by end of 2019

[noblynx]

Well I don't know why - it's a good question, although again, WE might want to know to be able to value it best. And yes, 20 yrs would certainly seem to me to be overkill, too. (Ask Lebby why 5,000?) But I do know the testing can't just be some simple, set-it-up once, push a button, walk away to wait for 2,000 straight hours to simply pass, after which the results get spit out by machine on some little piece of paper. They might only be at 3,000 hrs, now, given the complexity - who knows? But are they to simply jump at the first good offer? If a bidding war could be orchestrated, wouldn't that actually be best for shareholders?

[inversor86]

What if Lebby doesn't share the incremental data with companies in advance? Everyone waits and receives 5k at the same time.