I'm opposed to both: (1) Hayward retaining his positions on the Board of Directors (2) Reverse split, by all measures.[/quote][/quote]Let's figure out how to get a presentation on this damn share holders meeting. I already qualify as best looking retail holder:) But will willingly concede to anyone who wants to attend the meeting at Stonybrook and scream at Jim Heyward.
I don't want to remain on NASDAQ at a cost, and then continue our failures to date. Hayward has a lot of selling to do RIGHT NOW. Tired of supporting a crazy man's dreams. Seems like I've fallen for that.
Hayward hasn't met one of our stated goals or milestones.
They had the meeting with NASDAQ and must have a path forward for meeting all short term requirements. In order to get a 180 day extension on share price they would have to show good faith in raising the share price - thus getting approval for the board to do a reverse split.
A reverse split early (way before the extension is up) would be foolish. They would be guaranteed stock price taking a dive. IMO they will get approval, but then see what happens with orders over the next 5 months. If sp does not rise above $1 in 5 months, then you will see the RS.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
