bag8ger
Throughout the course of our correspondence on this board, and despite our obvious differences of opinion, you have always exemplied yourself as a person of class, notwithstanding my many provocations which could have easily caused you to stray from your good bearing. I would hope you have viewed our exchanges as being scintillating rather than scornful, enlightening rather than egregious, and informative rather than infuriating.
For this, and the mature manner in which you responded to the latest public death threat from Gcbr, I thank you. I seek no charity from you, instead I solicit your objectivity.
It seems incredulous how Gcbr, frustrated by an obvious inability to intelligently articulate a response to a post with which he has an obvious difference of opinion, can reduce himself to uttering public homicidal outrage. I do understand the reason for your continuing compassion for this person, despite his numerous deplorable transgressions of a similar nature on this and other message boards, but we shall not revisit that reason since I believe it is altogether quite obvious, abeit quite disconcerting.
It does seem that offending post has been uniformally blessed by the three moderators in attendance, so it apparently will remain permanantly enshrined here for all to see and Gcbr to salivate over.
I hope one day you will unconditionally come to understand that I, like you and many others here, am just a long term loser in this company with no agenda or payments from big pharma trying to address the important negatives and hoping for a way to recover at least my original investment. Once you have reach this enlightenment, then our correspondence can rightfully be confined to our only difference in how DNAG should be valued.
JMHO for your very kind consideration.
dr f
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
