Replies to post #52344 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[jever000]

frudaky, you know gcbr was just blowing steam...why make a big deal of it?

[bag8ger]

frudIago,

Enlightening?, informative?!

Any enlightenment or information you could give to this writer was contained in your first few posts, some three years ago.

That you are "hoping for a way to recover at least my original investment." argues loudly against your usual blather here which is aimed at nothing but a reduction in the pps by convincing weak-hand longs to sell and interested investors to move on.

You have an agenda, and it is that and your denial of it which
may make one entertain the thought Arch expressed last evening.

Bad Karma will follow you and your heirs doggedly.

BTW, I meant it when I told Arch I had a high regard for him and little for you.

[jever000]

frudaky, when i read your post...i bet you are giggling inside like a little boy as your typing....i can tell! they are quite comical!!.....

[ole vern]

Dr Fru (DragonEsquire, the lawyer) say:

"...I hope one day you will unconditionally come to understand that I, like you and many others here, am just a long term loser in this company with no agenda or payments from big pharma trying to address the important negatives and hoping for a way to recover at least my original investment."


__________________


As far back as I can remember reading your
posts (for years on RB) you have consistently
denigrated DNAP (now DNAG). I'm certain everyone
reading your posts agrees that you have approached
the problem of the low PPS with the correct strategy
to get that price to go up. We all understand that
when you constantly bad-mouth this company, you are
merely doing it to try to get the price to go up.
That tactic has worked really well, hasn't it? We
can all feel comfort in the fact that you have done
your part in getting the price to where it is today.

Thanks a lot, Drag!!!