InvestorsHub Logo

BLOnGO

09/22/19 9:40 AM

#180211 RE: The Paraclete #180210

If there was nothing to protect (no huge future revenues), Lugee would not have taken action. I.e., big revenues are in the picture for LQMT in the not too distant future. THAT is the takeaway regarding the lawsuit.


This articulates my immediate assessment from the start of the case. No amount of frustration or agenda driven analysis expressed by others is likely to convince me otherwise. While I have occasionally fretted about the timing, possible motivations for, and outcomes of some actions taken by LQMT/Prof Li, I have done so with the knowledge that my observations are being made through a soda straw. I sure don’t like that optic, but that’s the current reality. For what to me are obvious reasons, this situation is different and going by a universal axiom - Follow The Money - I get a lot of reassurance from this litigation.

This is a high-risk/high-reward (and for some a frustratingly many years long) venture. My advice (to myself alone) is HOLD FAST
GLTALs

handsomehank

09/22/19 10:18 AM

#180212 RE: The Paraclete #180210

I understand that and we should all be grateful for Professor Li’s commitment to the brand and LQMT USA
It is a confirmation (for us longs) of our speculation during these very quiet past two years but the action also needs to send a clear message to JK and any other potential thieves of the brand at this early stage of global development. Hoping it is more than a slap on the wrist and that ultimately there are proceeds and meaningful consequences for the defendant that’s all. TWT&GLTALongs