This articulates my immediate assessment from the start of the case. No amount of frustration or agenda driven analysis expressed by others is likely to convince me otherwise. While I have occasionally fretted about the timing, possible motivations for, and outcomes of some actions taken by LQMT/Prof Li, I have done so with the knowledge that my observations are being made through a soda straw. I sure don’t like that optic, but that’s the current reality. For what to me are obvious reasons, this situation is different and going by a universal axiom - Follow The Money - I get a lot of reassurance from this litigation.
This is a high-risk/high-reward (and for some a frustratingly many years long) venture. My advice (to myself alone) is HOLD FAST GLTALs
I understand that and we should all be grateful for Professor Li’s commitment to the brand and LQMT USA It is a confirmation (for us longs) of our speculation during these very quiet past two years but the action also needs to send a clear message to JK and any other potential thieves of the brand at this early stage of global development. Hoping it is more than a slap on the wrist and that ultimately there are proceeds and meaningful consequences for the defendant that’s all. TWT&GLTALongs