InvestorsHub Logo

Dell_Griffith

09/16/19 9:27 PM

#179848 RE: Gamesc #179847

And I don't even think those court filings tell the whole story. I think they're just the tip of the iceberg.

Watch, now they're going to seal the records, lol. I wouldn't blame them. That's already a lot of trade secrets. I mean, hell, they disclosed in that email that they need an NDA! You think that customer is going to go back to him now??? Lol, dumbass discusses things like that in emails??? What a moron.

I guarantee his atty saw some of the other emails and docs and said, "You're screwed if you turn these over." So, Kang is refusing - typical dumbass strategy as the Judge will look at him like he has 3 heads. No Federal jurist of even remote competence is going to buy that pile of manure. He's dead, dead, dead....he's lucky if they don't end up holding him in contempt of court.

Dell_Griffith

09/16/19 9:33 PM

#179849 RE: Gamesc #179847

I just thought about that - if he can BS a REAL potential customer company, I'm thinking he probably BS'd them, too.

All it takes is a google search on this guy. Why didn't they bother to vet him? Too often, dollar signs get in the way of vetting properly.

I just googled "John Kang criminal trial" and these popped up:


https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2539963/united-states-v-kang/


https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/two-former-executives-medical-manager-found-guilty-securities-fraud-scheme