InvestorsHub Logo

EMPATHY

09/14/19 10:47 AM

#170770 RE: rayovac812 #170768

The original question regarding this posted theory:

The 1 for 40 was to scare the price down for the warrants to be issued last month. He needed those at a lower price. ... and possibly financing...



I stated this was entirely possible and asked for a follow up(still waiting), it probably is illegal.

I felt it was plausible because Dum-Dum Kim sat on the Polartech "partnership' for three years.I never said sitting on this news specifically was illegal.It was stupid to do so though.
It only cost chairholders 3 more years of suffering at a nickle.

gl longs

jetow

09/14/19 11:08 AM

#170771 RE: rayovac812 #170768

“Comical.”

There is a lot of that going on lately. But we can relax cause no sky falling here.

M37 Dodge

09/14/19 11:31 AM

#170773 RE: rayovac812 #170768

JMHO...Polartech pushed the April 17th announcement since they were in talks with Miliken to get their deal done. It might have been used as a pot sweetner???