The 5th combination ruling and Daubert.
If NOT allowed, almost slam dunk for ChanBond.
If allowed, just opens the door for a little doubt.
Maybe I'm missing something, but that's how I understand it.
As Specialneeds posted, have to go through every step carefully so no "Real" issues for an appeal.
Each expert interpreted differently so... Subjective?
The defense is playing their game with all sorts of "Whatevers" & "Last stand BS".
They're selling whatever they can or trying to get that spaghetti to stick.