Replies to post #168196 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Zaidy]

I've been here for years and never understood why the INTELLICELL BIOSCIENCES, INC case was put on our docket as well.
From what I understand it basically says that after LUCIA they sent out letters asking if they wanted a new trial and INTELLICELL BIOSCIENCES, INC never responded.

[chartman2000]

Basically saying if Intel doesn't respond by Oct 4th they are revoked. As for DBMM this is a good sign could be close to a decision soon.

[johnydollar]

It's amazing how the SEC is nursing intellicell, they have not shown or put any effort and they still give them more time.

[rozzy]

).
In view of the reassignment of the proceeding, the undersigned independently determined
that Intellicell Biosciences was served with the OIP on May 18, 2017, by USPS Express Mail
attempted delivery at “the most recent address shown on [its] most recent filing with the
Commission,” in accordance with 17 C.F.R. § 201.141(a)(2)(ii), and afforded it a new opportunity
to file an Answer, which was due by October 12, 2018. Digital Brand Media & Mktg. Grp., Admin.
Proc. Rulings Release No. 6082, 2018 SEC LEXIS 2593, at *4 (Sept. 25, 2018). To date, it has failed
to file an Answer. Accordingly, Intellicell Biosciences IS ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, by
October 4, 2019, why it should not be deemed to be in default and the registration of its securities
revoked. See OIP at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f).