InvestorsHub Logo

Pennsy

09/02/19 10:36 AM

#159394 RE: WebSlinger #159393

I hear ya, that makes sense. There are some board members that don't live too far from Arrayit, and could validate what your suggesting. I'm not saying they are, but if they are Pumpers, we may not hear anything about it. But their individual curiosity should motivate them to do a drive-by, I would think. If not, we have to see what happens with SloanRH, his tour has been scheduled for 10/2. So we wait.

MikeCr

09/02/19 11:04 AM

#159395 RE: WebSlinger #159393

I doubt they would allow themselves to be evicted out of their current CLIA approved lab. To get a new lab and obtain a new CLIA certification would take years. The $240M worth of test kits (blood cards, lancets, etc) would be of no use if they can't process the blood samples at their CLIA certified lab.

Aug 8
Arrayit clinical team commences $240,000,000 test kit manufacturing run to build inventory for our rapidly expanding physician-ordered finger stick allergy testing services empowering clinic network doctors to identify, manage and treat allergy and asthma

edward1981

09/02/19 11:35 AM

#159398 RE: WebSlinger #159393

If it's TRUE the eviction. With 2 million+ a week in sales; Mark would really be a jerk not paying the rent. What is he doing with the money? RRBB GONE TOO! Is Mark sane?

kex0414

09/02/19 12:02 PM

#159401 RE: WebSlinger #159393

If the Landlord were successful in its Unlawful Detainer suit (wrongfully referred to as eviction), then according to the Statute, the file would be opened to the public, and Arrayit would be named as Defendant, and adjudicated file would be open.

Since the document is not open to the public, then the Landlord did not win in the 60 days allotted.

Eviction Notice
Tenant does not vacate
Unauthorized Detainer filed
Attempt to remove Tenant
valid for 60 days
or
start again

In this case, Landlord won eviction by Default (hence Arrayit's name appears in public document), but there is no public document (that I have found) showing the Landlord was successful in removing Arrayit.

Until that document appears, Arrayit has not been forced to leave.

Refiling of Unlawful Detainer by Landlord appears to me that there are ongoing negotiations including a protracted Lease-to-Own contract.*

*Just another possibility.