Replies to post #212068 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[concapk]

Mellowmood77

The motion AMARIN asked for partial summary judgement was related to depositions both parties undertook concerning OBVIOUSNESS, ANTICIPATION, ENABLEMENT, AND DEFINITIVENESSS....and generics asked for final summary judgement for AMARIN'S motion to be denied....

This new motion was submitted to the court, is asking them to rule on only on OBVIOUSNESS using prior court rulings.....or NONOBVIOUSNESS using AMARIN'S defense against OBVIOUSNESS.... like you state a possible loophole....

I would assume the court would allow AMARIN to cite additional court ruling s that would address this situation... or lack of.....

The question is what written information is required in a PATENT !!!