Replies to post #212003 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Whalatane]

Thx
Kiwi

[Atom0aks]

Thank you! I am on mobile and could only skim it, but it looks like it's a response from Hikma's lawyer why Amarin's partial judgement summary should be dismissed. Is that the gist of it?

[Mellowmood77]

Thanks Cal.

So they are filing a motion that opposes Amarin's motion for partial summary judgement based on the following:

A.The written description requirement is not satisfied unless a POSA would believe based on evidence disclosed in the patent specification that the inventor possessed the claimed invention “as of the filing date.”

B.Amarin’s expert opines that, without clinical data, a POSA would not have found it obvious to use 4 grams per day of purified EPA, and would not have believed that purified EPA achieves the claimed effects.

C.Amarin’s patents disclose no data, and its experts opine that purified EPA was first shown to achieve the claimed effects
after the filing date.

D.There is no requirement for expert testimony on the ultimate issue of written description support, which can be resolved as a matter of law based on testimony by Amarin’s own experts.

So now the judge decides if he grants the motion or not correct? No more back and forth at this point.

[sharinky]

CalMustang, thank you so much for doing this. This is great. Can you also combine 252-254?

[concapk]

New motion by Generics 08-30-2019.....

Generics want Amarin's MOTION for partial summary judgement denied based on....

If I get this right.... Generic's are stating that they are not claiming Amarins patents are invalid for ANTICIPATION,ENABLEMENT, OR INDEFINITENESS.... but are invalid for NONOBVIOUSNESS.....thus the three area's are moot except Obviousness....

Generics are stating that Amarins patents were written in year 2008/2009 and accepted by patent office .... but the MARINE trial was done in year 2010 and the results made the patents now OBVIOUS .... thus Amarin has no written proof that when submitting patents that the drug in fact worked...lowering tri's ,etc.

Generics are claiming that the patents are NONOBVIOUS and are invalid since no written proof was attached to patent submittal.... thus can't write a Patent if you don't know results beforehand....

Somewhere the results of the JELLIS TRIAL will emerge.....

[concapk]

CalMUSTANG

Do you have any updates on the generic court case with AMARIN..... the response to the new motions presented on 08-30-2019 were to be heard today...