InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

trader59

08/29/19 4:16 PM

#25942 RE: daiello #25937

Oh geez. Ever stop to think "why would a company that is allegedly thriving and growing ever sell itself?"

That's a huge hole in this narrative. Not a chance any business person/owner with half a lick of sense is going to sell off a company for what you've described as their annual revenue (which is still unknown, since it hasn't been published) to a grey sheet stinky pink stock. It is absurd to even suggest.
icon url

threewheeler

08/29/19 4:26 PM

#25943 RE: daiello #25937

well put and 99.5% more likely the case we are looking at here, zero share selling scam, quite the opposite, when they found old managers had issued illegal shares, went to court and had them cancelled 100% true and verifiable, not speculation, opinion or conjecture, facts. So in fact a scam would have to enrich some one on the inside, but SOLI has only spent millions $$$ to bring this to where it is currently, zero reason to drop the ball on the 1 yard line, they will push it over the goal shortly, OTCQB for starters SOLI SOLId
icon url

elkonig

08/29/19 4:46 PM

#25948 RE: daiello #25937

If anything as you described is a material event it must be declared as such in SEC filings. The definitive agreement between SOLI and KB/Careclix contained no such caveats of 80/20 splits or anything of that nature. The lower the share price the more shares SOLI has to fork over to Korangy.
The company SOLI has stated in their financial documents they want to get to the OTCQB, no mention of NASDAQ at all.
The definitive agreement by means of the 8K on April 15th is just that. The only thing missing from that document are the balance sheets of Careclix that are nowhere to be found.
icon url

Running Q

08/29/19 6:44 PM

#25958 RE: daiello #25937

Second that Daiello...well thought out and articulate. Looking forward to the next few months
icon url

DDR

08/30/19 12:02 AM

#25982 RE: daiello #25937

Very good analysis. My thoughts as well. Sure hope we are correct.