Replies to post #178508 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[The Paraclete]

Outstanding!!!

[joshuaeyu]

Look for 2H19 Revenue to at least double 1H19

They doubled the machines.

There might be licensing revenue on top also.

Note EON only owned 60% YiHao metal who is doing the heavy lifting.

It means actual Liquid Metal revenue from YiHao is doubled what is posted from Eon.

[Eagle1947]

That is all well and good .. now, how will that help my LQMT stock appreciate ?

[DMN]

Thanks Gavin for digging this out and posting.

[JoTu]

the tide is rising thanks for posting

[PatentGuy1]

From Eontec's Preliminary Interim Report we know that Eontec is working on CE but we don’t know whether such work utilizes LQMT licensed technology per the PLA.

Assuming for the moment that Eontec is utilizing LQMT licensed technology, then Eontec is either violating the terms of the PLA or working with Apple and Apple has granted a license to use CIP technology in CE. If Eontec is working with Apple, then why would Apple want LQMT to be a middleman between Eontec and Apple - middlemen increase costs. If Eontec is violating the terms of the PLA, why would Eontec then honor the territorial exclusivity clause of the PLA?

Assuming for the moment that Eontec is NOT utilizing LQMT licensed technology, then Eontec is outside of the PLA and territorial exclusivity doesn’t apply. How then does revenue flow to LQMT?

Food for thought for those interested in critical thinking.