Disagree. The Granted Motion to Dismiss is a permanent part of the Court Docket for this case. It shows that GDSI failed to meet Conditions Precedent. The Court gave GDSI a small window of time to file the First Amended Complaint (FAC).
The Original Complaint that was Dismissed is also a permanent part of the Court Docket.
Rontan's Answer to the First Amended Complaint is in a Reply to my Stickie. It's very insightful. It further demonstrates their view that Delgado arbitrarily amended the SPA and thus did not meet all Conditions Precedent.
Links to the docket are in the iBox. People can read what they want to read, and believe what they want to believe.
I absolutely agree the sticky is no longer relevant and is totally misleading. It should be removed. It maybe a permanent court record but it is useless now and means didly squat The latest press release states that all aspects of the motion to dismiss has been denied. Discovery and depositions have commenced and trial set for December. Funding contingent on surviving the motion to dismiss received as well as additional funding. Out of court settlement forthcoming. Rontan will fold like a cheap suit.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
