Bio you have done a great job on the board and worked endlessly.But you are a thorn in her side and she never gave you you any info over the years but just one liner replies.Let Amrn work wouldcock.best of luck in the future
Do you have an example of an AdCom that occurred after a PDUFA action date? My research has only shown extensions (see Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Acorda, and Sage Therapeutics), which is inline with FDA goals outlined here (https://www.fda.gov/media/99140/download). Keep in mind, the document may only outline goals and may not be SOP. I will concede, however, that an AdCom this late in the cycle is contrary to said goals of convening AC meetings 6 weeks prior to the PDUFA goal date for priority reviews.
BB..."It’s totally acceptable for the FDA to hold an Ad Com after PDUFA date and “some” label expansion."
This makes a lot of sense...the rational for the Adcom is to give expert advice to the FDA on the decision to approve or disapprove a drug...there is an abundance of information in the public domain to support approval of the sNDA of R-IT...what remains are label questions, such as the role of triglyceride levels and statins...these questions can provide a proper focus for discussion at an an Adcom after the PDUFA date.