InvestorsHub Logo

bobbyinredwood

08/12/19 10:45 AM

#31469 RE: Aqua-FX #31468

Without looking I believe Noche is .398 so nearly double our major neighbors grades.

All looking good Aqua! I know you’ve been around as long as I have, it’s been quite the ride but looks like our time has finally come.

MXSG the bull is back!!

gitreal

08/12/19 2:45 PM

#31481 RE: Aqua-FX #31468

Recheck your math. If you throw out the outlier you have 11.311/16 holes = .706 g/ton which is still good for open pit.


See, this is exactly why issuing a PR and a copy of an assay sheet without a credible and complete explanation is that it causes confusion amongst investors. Where do you see anything about "holes"??

The assays came from "material". That's it, that's the only explanation. Was that material in-situ in the pit? From a stock pile, before crushing, or maybe after crushing? From the pad itself after loading? And how were the samples collected - in a statistically valid manner, by a professional who documented the sampling? Were the samples handled in a manner that minimized potential for tampering?

And no, I am not going to call PT. After the amateurish and deceptive way they averaged the Argo drill hole results, and now this? What's the point of asking the hobby miner anything?

saildone

08/12/19 10:11 PM

#31487 RE: Aqua-FX #31468

Right you are, I intended to type over 0.5 grams. Not over 1.5.
Oh well, there is no spell check for numbers.