Monday, August 12, 2019 2:45:57 PM
See, this is exactly why issuing a PR and a copy of an assay sheet without a credible and complete explanation is that it causes confusion amongst investors. Where do you see anything about "holes"??
The assays came from "material". That's it, that's the only explanation. Was that material in-situ in the pit? From a stock pile, before crushing, or maybe after crushing? From the pad itself after loading? And how were the samples collected - in a statistically valid manner, by a professional who documented the sampling? Were the samples handled in a manner that minimized potential for tampering?
And no, I am not going to call PT. After the amateurish and deceptive way they averaged the Argo drill hole results, and now this? What's the point of asking the hobby miner anything?
Do your own research, use third-party sources, and don't buy into the hype.
Recent MXSG News
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/28/2023 01:47:39 PM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM