InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 183
Posts 41401
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 03/21/2012

Re: Aqua-FX post# 31468

Monday, 08/12/2019 2:45:57 PM

Monday, August 12, 2019 2:45:57 PM

Post# of 47639
Recheck your math. If you throw out the outlier you have 11.311/16 holes = .706 g/ton which is still good for open pit.


See, this is exactly why issuing a PR and a copy of an assay sheet without a credible and complete explanation is that it causes confusion amongst investors. Where do you see anything about "holes"??

The assays came from "material". That's it, that's the only explanation. Was that material in-situ in the pit? From a stock pile, before crushing, or maybe after crushing? From the pad itself after loading? And how were the samples collected - in a statistically valid manner, by a professional who documented the sampling? Were the samples handled in a manner that minimized potential for tampering?

And no, I am not going to call PT. After the amateurish and deceptive way they averaged the Argo drill hole results, and now this? What's the point of asking the hobby miner anything?

Do your own research, use third-party sources, and don't buy into the hype.