InvestorsHub Logo

kabunushi

08/11/19 12:55 PM

#239312 RE: JerryCampbell #239309

I think you'll shout about 'insider dealing' in any case anyway. Leaving this unsettled doesn't seem to me as big a deal as it is to you. There may well be a difference in whether the term should be 2 years or 4 years and believe it or not the BoD have other things going on and maybe settling that point has just not been a high priority to them as it is to you conspiracy theorists.

I'm not a lawyer nor a corporate governance specialist but I don't buy that it's as simple as she can cut herself a $4M check any time she wants to. That sounds like nonsense because it would be shocking lack of fiscal control if that were the case where she would be writing a check in that amount to herself. Just the sort of thing that would be yet another cause for you to squawk.

gropgrip

08/11/19 1:11 PM

#239313 RE: JerryCampbell #239309

To be flexible to make room for prospective investors as soon as news is out.

gropgrip

08/11/19 1:19 PM

#239315 RE: JerryCampbell #239309

After results to distribute the remaining 100m and maybe more shares to new shareholders could be worth more than getting all those warrants.

Not finalizing the agreement might be used to reduce the warrant count.