So tell me .... would you be OK with a label covering up to 1/3 rd of the US adult population .... without an Adcom
You seem pretty level headed . I’ve read your posts for years .
Make the case for why the FDA should grant a label covering up to 1/3 rd of the US adult population .... without an Adcom ..... based solely on R-It data .... of which only about 2,800 were primary prevention at risk of a CV event .