Replies to post #65524 on NaturalShrimp Inc (SHMP)

[fantasytrip]

Then OBVIOUSLY the system does NOT assure the facility can keep the water and shrimp disease free because SOMEBODY didn't take into account introduction of infected hatchlings when setting up their ELABORATELY planned and implemented and expensive system.

After being in the shrimp business for 15 years, it is MORE THAN OBVIOUS that before any shrimp are introduced into SUCH A NEW system, the health of the hatchling or any minute water introduced with them WOULD HAVE TO to be VERIFIED disease free ON THEIR END, not by the word of a SELLER.

AND THEY are accountable to the investors for THAT, NOT THE THIRD PARTY.

Sorry, but it is a really PAT excuse to simply dismiss out of hand their culpability in THIS particular issue arising.

Furthermore, they stated they suspected the issue back in March and April, and then let it slide because the TPWD didn't pick up on it??? SO the timing of all of this stinks like putrefying shrimp and again, no, this cannot simply be passed off as the responsibility of the third party in making their excuses to shareholders only a couple of weeks before what should have been the first harvest.

[Ecomike]

The problem WAS-SHMP, they failed to catch the infected PL-shrimp before they brought them to the plant, again when they brought them in the plant and for 4+ months while the infected shrimp were in the plant eating and growing and consuming investor dollars.

That does not instill confidence in Ms-management in any way shape or form.

[jimr1717]

Zzzzz back to one cent Zzzzz