InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Shinook99

08/09/19 7:43 AM

#207127 RE: pax33 #207119

Pax - now that’s good stuff. So basically, AMRN wants to know the angel of all the haters and the arguments they are using against Amarin. If they know those arguments, then (if an adcom were called for...which it has been now) they are already ahead of the curve and have prepped counter arguments for the negative stuff already out there.

Basically you are saying they are trying to be prepared from all angles....not really interested in lawsuits.
icon url

raistthemage

08/09/19 7:47 AM

#207131 RE: pax33 #207119

I understand some of you guys believe the requests are aimed at discovering collusion/conspiracy. Honestly, it will be unlikely for us to find anything of that sort, because it probably doesn't exist. Even if it did exist, I don't think in the event there is collusion (w/ implied illegal benefit to FDA members in some form or other) the parties involved would communicate it blatantly via official channels.



Once again... the seemingly incredible cap raise with a ludicrous cover story of why they needed to do it before approval and the FDA requesting them to keep it secret and JT not playing along... all of this taken together put the weight of evidence behind the conspiracy thesis. This is war.

Luckily AMRN apparently has some kind of back channel for getting FDA information.

As for your idea that such a conspiracy is unlikely to exist and that they wouldn't talk about it. One wouldn't think some FBI agents would try to frame the President of the United States as an agent of a foreign power either, and talk about details of the conspiracy in text messages with his girlfriend but yet Peter Strzok did that (as well as all sorts of other loose talk surrounding the whole plot... oh and them installing a senile old moronic dirty cop bureaucrat as the "prosecutor" who was supposed to frame the President). Bureaucrats just aren't always all that smart and they just can't help but leave paper trails everywhere. AMRN knew about this screw job in advance. I think they will be caught.

Astrazeneca (or whatever other big pharma initiated this) probably is less likely to get caught... their top people are likely much smarter then government bureaucrats.
icon url

jessellivermore

08/09/19 7:53 AM

#207137 RE: pax33 #207119

pax...

I like the start of the post...I don't think the Pyrr part is germane..

First off we can only speculate what is coming down at the AdCom..The FDA may not being plotting some form of revenge ...but simply doing their job and the size and importance of the drug is as JT says..Puts it in a category where an AdCom is appropriate..I think we are too scarred because of the 2013 AdCom...I was dumbstruck by what happened, but over the years I understand why FDA did what it did...because of a mistake (a huge mistake) FDA made in awarding an SPA for a CVD drug which had no CVOT...

There is not going to be an issue like that in this AdCOM..The FDA is going to have to walk past four caskets to deny Vascepa...Those would be the AHA, the ADA, ICER, and Canada...In this AdCom we have what we need..Which is the R-I results and the support of the medical authorities and believe me..Pyrr is not going to impress them..

":>) JL
icon url

mrmainstreet

08/09/19 9:54 AM

#207225 RE: pax33 #207119

Right but FOIA can take months or years as agencies slow walk the process. Not sure it will be impactful at all before the Adcom.
icon url

rafunrafun

08/09/19 12:23 PM

#207297 RE: pax33 #207119

P - people didn't think that corruption at the highest levels of the FBI could never occur, and then there is this:

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-fbi-302-interviews-with-bruce-ohr-on-spygate-released-to-judicial-watch/