OK, Mr. Smartguy riddle me this. In AI world if not fail-extension is set equal to pass (redefine) then what values do you put on limits. PM will emphasize early fail. You have then to better define what is next once we get results that show evidence of possible efficacy. Since all this CNS disease have never been effectively treated this is a gray area. We only can define fail. We are now buying time using an old clock.
AVXL staff surely know what is going on. Patients will eventually make this obvious. This cannot go on for long, IMO. Interim results are everywhere for sure. I always thought that some RETT mom would let us know.
So, we assume that NOT FAIL is set equal to extension. You must Write the inference logic for the rest of it. Somehow the investment calendar and the science calendar have to get in synch. I hear Dr.M. saying, not yet or have I not read it correctly?. The only question we have to ask is, if they had poor results would they let us know? How? When? Some new clock must be developed which synchs up the PM results clock w/all the rest of us.