InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

marzan

08/02/19 7:58 AM

#238238 RE: longfellow95 #238236

Dr. Stupp is a big fat rat in this GBM field who knows how to skew his numbers real well. In other words a big time fudging is what he is doing. He should be ashamed of being a medical doctor doing this kind of low things just to make name and fame or even money. In the absence of nothing, people including FDA took his crap. It is time DcVax L gets unblinded and throw the fake ones into the burning pit.
icon url

sukus

08/02/19 9:06 AM

#238242 RE: longfellow95 #238236

Thank you longfellow. No wonder why LP kept this trial this long. So enough has occured to set the 5 yr OS for DCvax-l trial set in stone. To any competitors who disagree like Dr Stupp for example, NWBO would just let them peruse the numbers of these survivors themselves.

These are undeniable numbers based on actual number of survivors.

In case of optune, their OS numbers looks pretty decent but DCvax-l number will beat those numbers imo.

In case of optune, if they cannot back up those numbers with actual long tails of survivors, then that is not good for the patients.
icon url

extrooper

08/02/19 9:17 AM

#238244 RE: longfellow95 #238236

Excellent read.
icon url

sukus

08/02/19 10:29 AM

#238271 RE: longfellow95 #238236

Agree.

“Suffice to say, our survival figures match theirs up to 2yrs, as does median OS, but anything beyond 2yrs, DCVax figures pull away to clear superiority, and the further you go, the greater the superiority. “