Flipper thanks much for this poster presentation that includes the 32 pseudo arm. You spoke of this group in the past and I think it is potentially very important. I have been very much disagreed with but imo nwbo could talk about this group of 32 in a similar way they speak of the main trial of 331. The group of 32 is also blinded but nwbo could still say blended months of survival is a great number and the % that on crossover have received DCVa-L Innes is worthless but he was promoting to me the results of the 25 indeterminates and then when I asked about the 32 pseudoprogressors that group “is too small to mean anything “. I believe the 32 are very meaningfull and should be a great success unless they did not survive as should be expected and nwbo just does not want to expose this data. I need to stop, my real question tomorrow is for a person in need of a miracle from direct but so far 0 for 3 and after tomorrow probably 0 for 4
Again get thanks for the poster presentation they had another one a year later I believe also including the 32 and very little after that. This is the group that should have done the best and should brag on unless was a failure
Flipper do you think nwbo could talk about this blinded group of 32 in a similar way they discuss the blinded 331?