I don't know that this is true and even if it is, how does that reconcile with the fact that this board has been overwhelmingly positive for most of its history? We all did nothing but say what a neat thing this company, its product and the geniuses that ran it are. The value of this company, its share price and revenue has been consistently down since late 2013. Go back and take a look at the narrative of this board over that time frame. It was a love fest.
I remember only two people that were consistently bashing it back then, RFB and Alan
I picked a random month. October 2015. In that month, there were a total of 525 posts. Of those posts 20 (3.81%) were negative in my opinion. The rest were either positive or neutral. The negative posts were the usual suspects we see today. One of the biggest pumpers in the room back then was Mr DeeDee. The stock price was down 13.79% for that month. Price went from $17.40 to $15.00. Were the 3.8% negative posts responsible for this or did it maybe have to do with how the company is run? If 96.2% of the positive narrative couldn't get the price to move up then, what is the magic number? Was it your fault?