Replies to post #200451 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[MedResCollab]

Companies with drug candidates, and/or just the drug candidates themselves, targeting NASH resolution. There are quite a few.

We have also gotten interest in performing customized analyses. We see that being largely the direction our firm will go in. These reports will be privately distributed to the respective clients that commission us to perform these targeted analyses, and you'll never see them, unless our clients subsequently decide to publicly disseminate them.

Our analysis on Amarin Corp. is our first as a company, and we are babysitting it a bit if you will. We are also conducting an activist campaign of our own volition, to set precedent, and because as always, we very much believe in the strength of our analysis, and feel it may help over-burdened regulators.

Regards,
-MRC Team

[amarinbullfromchicago]

I have a feeling they will be the ones Shwarma and Stevie G talk about all the time...they must just have a webpage where people who don’t cut getting an MD try to make fake science.

It’s hilarious that he talks about “studies” and “proven to work” about otc supplements, then ignores an 8 year thousands of patients study with p values almost as low as his bank account.

But that was a really good question/point dmlcento, so weird a “medical collab” only looks at one company and is a big seller. A drug with no side effects and already has too much traction to be stopped by some fudsters

[IgnoranceIsBliss]

dmlcento, MRC is not performing ANY "investigations".

An investigation is where you research a topic with no preconceived biases, and then the facts govern the conclusions drawn. What was done here was that a conclusion was assumed, and then facts were selectively gathered to support that pre-determined conclusion. This is not an investigation -- it is an exercise in confirmation bias. It is rather ironic that "MRC" would do this, considering his endless rants against confirmation bias in the past.

I know for an absolute fact that I am correct about this.

An investigation also does not throw every negative angle conceivable up at the wall, even if those angles contradict each other, just to see what will stick. That is not an investigation -- it is gaslighting.

Happily, serious people and government agencies don't take direction from sinister dysfunctional people masquerading as experts.