Replies to post #81646 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

If there was NEVER any intention of monetizing, not even in the beginning when 1st acquired, which is questionable in my mind, that means that when with GREAT FANFARE we were told multiple times, especially by Chang, that the newly acquired technology was going to be integrated into the vplm voip services platform, pushing vplm to the the pinnacle of the industry and to immediately begin collecting tens of millions of dollars per month in royalties and gain millions of subscribers....... then it means THAT WAS ALSO A LIE EVEN THEN WITH NO INTENTION OF DOING THAT TO BEGIN WITH.

Personally, I believe that at least some of the BOD believed in it in the very beginning, but I think it became apparent not too much later, that it was a flawed idea and hope.

I am surprised that finra/sec has not yet stepped in. They are aware of vplm and they already had a case they procecuted criminally, involving many vplm shares diverted to offshore money houses... And Kipping was also mentioned in that case, as well as vplm, so anyway I would never be surprised to see yet another case by sec.

[nyt]

One thing is pretty clear to me...
Myself and other shareholders are not going to see the longed for massive profits for a long long time, if ever and my best guess would be never. In other words, you can't take it to the bank.

[gastric]

Federal judge already deemed some intelligible. Invalid. I expect that very same Federal judge to do the same with the current case, too.

[DeerBalls]

TOTAL BULLSHIT: It takes the PTAB two full trials AND over a year to conclude, "VPLM, you own the patents"????? YEAH, RIGHT! A lot more goes into and comes out of a full year long, IPR trial, LOTS MORE!

If the patents are worthless, HOW DOES VPLM HAVE A $36mm MARKET CAP??? I don't care what the market has been, it is $36mm now, WITH VPLM HOLDING "WORTHLESS ASSETS??? Are empty corporate trading shells worth $36mm now? I think not!

Last thing: NO, EMIL NEVER SAID THE PATENTS ARE WORTHLESS, IN A TRUE SENSE!!!!! HE DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT AND IT WAS STATED IN A RHETORICAL SENSE TO EMPHASIZE THE CORRUPT NATURE OF THE PATENT SYSTEM IN THE U.S.!

Plowmaster Member Level Saturday, 06/29/19 09:40:33 PM
Re: Afazio post# 81645 0
Post #
81646
of 81654
It’s not that the patents aren’t valid. They are just worthless. Heck even the CEO says it. All the ptab does it says ‘yes you own these patents’ but that is vastly different than being able to make any claims against them. They can’t do that, and never will which makes them worthless

That was the driving force of the whole company. ‘Let’s get patents that play close enough in the same arena we can tie up courts, but we know they will never win. However we can sell shares for years and make ourselves a lot of money’

That’s what is going on. There was never any intention of monetizing these, just the illusion while they fleece shareholders.

Run