InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

KCSVEN

06/26/19 3:35 PM

#198618 RE: rafunrafun #198616

Doesn't each department within CDER determine the ADCOM. So if Division of Neurology has an Adcom scheduled it has no bearing on the Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products so I would think as long as the Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products has set one for August 7 then they would be chronological and will not schedule one before that but if it's another division I don't think that would apply.

Maybe I'm wrong on how they schedule but I swear I read it is by department somewhere but will defer to someone with better knowledge/memory if they have better info.
icon url

Biobillionair

06/26/19 3:51 PM

#198620 RE: rafunrafun #198616

RAF-The earliest the FDA could schedule an Ad Com now for anything is 55 days from 6-28 or 8-22-2019. FDA must give sponsors a 55 day notice.

In addition to the above an Ad Com for Vascepa must take place 6 weeks before assigned PDUFA date for Amarin this date is 8-17.

Obviously an Ad Com can not be scheduled for 8-17, it doesn’t provide the sponsor a 55 day notice.

Technically the window is closed for Ad Coms with a PDUFA date as close as Amarin...the FDA can however delay PDUFA date, but this would obviously be a huge issue for FDA.

So why didn’t the FDA communicate with Amarin? Because there’s bad blood between the two due to past legal issues.

I have requested an explanation yesterday, got nothing.

Today I requested the Senate HELP send a direct letter to Dr. Woodcock to clarify why PDUFA goal dates are being arbitrarily ignored regarding Vascepa application.

BB