InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Biostockclub

06/25/19 11:39 AM

#197912 RE: baltimorebullet #197910

That’s how I originally read it.

I guess it depends upon the author of the PR. I’m pretty sure they never intended it to be picked apart this avidly.

I’m going with the face value of the information and let the chips fall where they may. I believe this is intended as 100% unambiguous positive announcement. While leaving room for others to have their thoughts differ accordingly,

Thanks, BB

Bio
icon url

attilathehunt

06/25/19 11:45 AM

#197915 RE: baltimorebullet #197910

“Doesn't the comma after the word patient imply it was the first patient? “

That is how I read it. It really can’t be anyone else. PR’s is a major way to communicate to stakeholders and to imply it is other than the very first patient would indicate a very misleading statement. The people behind the PR’s are professionals and thus one should believe they wouldn’t be sloppy or misleading.

icon url

anders2211

06/25/19 3:42 PM

#197988 RE: baltimorebullet #197910

voluntarily moved into the extension study

Its really what it says. The first patient moved from the first phase into the extension of the trial study.
If the drug would not present relief the volunteer patient or his her parents would not permit to continue the trial in the extension phase.
Would you? I would not. Heck it does not do anything but lets continue vitamin C placebo. Ofcourse not. Its the same news with the Alzheimer extension...!

This press release is good news period.