InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

flipper44

06/05/19 1:21 AM

#231487 RE: manibiotech #231484

Do you understand she is collecting more shares while the price is low due to the loan interest she charges? This is debt financing. If you know or strongly believe you have a successful product, but conduct public discourse in the form of goal post moving whilst gaining more shares through debt financing while the PPS is low, well that is one way of doing things I suppose.
icon url

GoodGuyBill

06/05/19 2:03 AM

#231495 RE: manibiotech #231484

manibiotech, I do listen to myself and agree it sounds crazy. But...IMHO...there is no explanation that I can think of as to why when such positive data is being presented it is usually accompanied by statement that tend to steel all momentum to the upside. I have seen biotech products that were ineffective or harmful to patients with market caps in the billions while we, GIVEN UNPRECEDENTED BLENDED SURVIVAL DATA, can't get a mc of a few hundred million!

One of the reasons this is so is that many of the communications/actions...PRs, data presentations and scheduling/actions... are written/done, imho, to INTENTIONALLY delay unblinding/topline and keep the pps in check.

Why this is happening...I have no idea, hence the frustration. The reasoning could be positive. Maybe, LP has implementing a strategy that we, having limited info/details, can't understand but will be handsomely rewarded.

It may sound crazy...but its what I think.

I believe LP is intentionally stalling the unblinding of the P3 trial AND purposefully keeping the pps from increasing.I am not saying NWBO is keeping the price down for a buyout. I don't know and can't even think of a legitimate reason for this, hence my frustration. Of course the delay in unblinding in the past has been to establish a long tail/OS #s. But the long tail has been established and is no longer the reason.

To me it seems that when NWBO communicates there is always something said or done that prevents the stock from naturally increasing. For example, you don't think the 200/300 queries could have been completed or the 1st draft of the SAP BEFORE ASAP? What other company would have PR'd the UNPRECEDENTED interim numbers that other companies would have died for and, then, in the same report tell the world essentially that NWBO didn't have a "pathway forward". What about the outstanding presentation where the cancer survivors talked about their battles and Dr. Ashkan said directly that he requests everyday that NWBO unblinds the p3. At the end LP gets up and begs the audience for money (i.e. implying that we are broke and about to go under)?

Linda is super-intelligent. IMHO, she is intentionally stalling AND preventing the pps from increasing...I am not joking. You cannot tell me that NWBO, with the Blended #s they have reported, that NWBO cannot get the word out in a legitimate way (without illegitimate/unfair pumping) that does not interfare with SEC/FDA.

Just my thoughts.