Replies to post #46145 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[prototype_101]

Gates I think yours and my interpretations of what LWLG responded to Inversor's email question regarding the 2000/5000 hours Reliability Testing are in agreement,

Gates said, My take is that LWLG is testing for 2000/5000 hours or until potential customers have enough confidence in LWLG's platform. So possibly LWLG does not have to run the full 5000 hours of testing to get potential customers on board? I guess it boils down to what is required for customers to have enough confidence to adopt this platform. The customers will let us know when they have enough data.

Proto said, my interpretation is that the 2000/5000 hours are fairly linear but that doesn't mean that the Tier 1's won't throw additional testings into the mix along the way, so maybe at 1000/2000 hours and everything is performing rock solid, then they throw a few more advanced tactics to try and "break" it, then if it still survives onward to say 2000/3000 hours then perhaps an even tougher set of trials/challenges are thrown at it, and so on until the Tier 1 at some point says "WoW just Wow" and then LWLG inks a HUGE deal for "design-in"


Dr Leonberger said (per Jssdmm post), Fred Leonberger: Great to see him there. He was very enthusiastic and said the data will come and "it will be great."

LWLG's reply to Inversor, This testing was described by a board member to give an example of common expectations and practices that explain why not everything can be accelerated by working harder. For telecom/datacom optics, this is a standard practice and so these sorts of timescales are typical.

But it is not a simple one time start, pass the time and then end. So I can say we have started but you should not infer that 5000 hours later we are done for good. Equally, it is incorrect to infer that we cannot do anything else until these 2000 or 5000 hours are done. Our goal is not to check off a piece of paperwork, our goal is to build confidence in the platform.

Ok, so presuming the tests began no later than the day after the Feb 28, 2019 news release of the New PkM materials, then 2000 hours have already been completed, however, imo the news release probably only came after say maybe 100/300/500 hours of testing occurred, it would not make good business sense to have not performed a decent level of testing before putting out the Feb 28, 2019 news release!

[inversor86]

Gates, I said something similar on here during the SHM. I think it's very possible. That the first deal might come down to risk tolerance of the partner. Someone who will take a chance after 2k or at 3k, 4k. Just to be ahead of others.