Replies to post #181461 on Bioelectronics Corp (BIEL)

[Simpsonly]

Tks for the 3 photos....I had a number wrong. Said 3 pallets a few times when it should have been 6 or 7 pallets in 3 overseas orders being held in limbo as deferred sales because of non-renewal of the expired CE Mark. Can anyone verify the number?

I still wonder if BIEL has used part of the shipment has been used to fulfill orders from other customers?

[art2426]

>>>671k would have sounded much better, Art. The BIEL Circus continues.<<<


You would think so, wouldn't it, mj ?? Just another head scratcher when trying to make any sense out of their strategical moves.