InvestorsHub Logo

Split T

05/13/19 7:34 PM

#574931 RE: cents2ks #574898

cent2ks, Thanks so much for the transcript of Mary Walrath's testimony to the House Judiciary Committee, it was very kind of you to post it for all to see.

PickStocks

05/13/19 9:28 PM

#574934 RE: cents2ks #574898

Just maybe she should have informed them through the corruption of my court I have allowed lawyers to pad fees and to manipulate the returning fund to equity holder to benefit hedge funds and other entities other than equity. I am just a puppet to lawyers with their hands directing how I should rule and have taken money under the table.

jerrylev

05/13/19 9:53 PM

#574937 RE: cents2ks #574898

Safe Harbor assets can be repurchased.

" Fourth, the fact that FIBA perpetuates the safe harbors for
repurchase agreements, derivatives, and other qualified
financial contracts, despite substantial evidence that the safe
harbors should be modified or eliminated."


TESTIMONY OF BRUCE GROHSGAL

Mr. Grohsgal. Thank you.
Good morning, Chairman Marino, Chairman Goodlatte, Ranking
Member Cicilline, Member Schneider, and the other Members of
the Committee. Thank you for inviting me to testify today with
respect to the Financial Institution Bankruptcy Act of 2017,
often referred to as FIBA.

First, the ``no liability'' safe harbor protection that Mr.
Hessler just referred to for directors under FIBA.
Second, the provisions of FIBA that will significantly
weaken the balance sheet of the bridge bank, making its
obtaining financing in the credit markets less likely and
making taxpayer bailouts more likely.
Third, the illusory and opaque nature of the restructuring,
all of which will occur within 48 hours, with most creditors
and other parties left out of the process and with minimal, if
any, knowledge of it or what happened in those 2 days.
Fourth, the fact that FIBA perpetuates the safe harbors for
repurchase agreements, derivatives, and other qualified
financial contracts, despite substantial evidence that the safe
harbors should be modified or eliminated.
And fifth, the necessity of retaining the orderly
resolution authority of Dodd-Frank Title II as a last but
crucial resort if the financial institution's bankruptcy
nonetheless poses substantial risk to the financial system. I
note with respect to that point that this bill does not end
Title II authority, but other bills that are being repeatedly
introduced before Congress do.

ron_66271

05/14/19 12:32 PM

#574972 RE: cents2ks #574898

Second, in contrast to FDIC proceedings,

bankruptcy cases are largely transparent. Today, all bankruptcy pleadings are filed electronically and are readily accessible to the public.
Bankruptcy hearings are open to the public and most courts allow parties in interest, including small creditors and shareholders, to appear and to listen telephonically, even to appear and make their case without the benefit of counsel, and many have done so successfully.
It is also important that the Bankruptcy Court provides a forum for negotiation and consensual resolution without the need for a contested hearing or trial, but with the assurance that a court is available if there is not consensus. In fact, plans of reorganization in Chapter 11 are premised largely on consensus and agreement.

Thanks Cents and Split for the discussion.

Yes BK is more transparent then the FDIC.