bbboy you posted some very clear points.
1. What’s sad and funny is all the hope/hype LQMT investors have put in Apple, only to be let down 10 years in a row.
This is true. Not just investors did this. Many credible stock market analyst did this too and that includes one of the best and highly rated Apple analyst in Asia. Now perhaps many here or should I say almost all believed in the hype without fully reading the agreements between Apple & LQMT. And some still are in denial to this day.
2. In addition many have lost money with all the scam artists producing false news, while SEC stood by and did nothing.
This point would be true if we knew how many. The ones that lost are the ones that sell at a price lower than what was paid for. NO ONE HAS LOST MONEY IF THEY DID NOT SELL. Those that bought in at a average higher pps than today’s closing price, have only lost value on paper only. No one gains or losses money until they sell or bankruptcy, whichever comes first.
3. On this board, posts are still trying to pump something out of nothing in regard to Apple-Liquidmetal.
Not true. No one on this board is pumping Apple/LQMT. Just like no one is pumping CE/LQMT on this board. It’s just that many here have different interpretations of the Apple/LQMT/Eontec agreements. No one post of a theory or misinterpreted LQMT agreement here, has raised nor dropped the pps of this stock, nor have any caused the average daily volume to move up or down. LQMT use to do that with pr & blogs. Self proclaimed market gurus occasionally do it for a few days.
4. Liquidmetal has been one of the biggest let downs in this decade as far as stocks go!
100% correct. No one who is of sound mind could argue with your 10 year assessment of a let down.
Now in my posts I always state no CE. Not because LQMT cannot enter CE. Because LQMT dropped CE and finally made that clear in the 2018 Annual report. But just so that you and everyone else understands. LQMT under the terms of the Apple/LQMT agreements can focus on CE again, providing they follow the terms agreed to. I have pointed that out and so to have at least one other poster.
The idea that someone is pumping LQMT becomes acutely exasperated by the fact that LQMT has not had a whale of a contract in any areas they claim to be focused on. Not even a goldfish.
When you post the stock is up and let’s say hypothetically cherry pick a few good days for LQMT, while ignoring the long term downward trend. Does that mean you’re pumping? No. It means you want the price to go upward, while ignoring the facts of reality and hoping the SP goes up. That’s not even a rumor.
So when others scream CE, while ignoring LQMT’s stated focus that’s doing just about the same thing and both ideas are not impossible. Just a little more improbable.
After all who here does not want to see LQMT’s SP rocket up? It’s just that some believe it’s more probable with CE, be it from an Apple contract and some here believe it will be CE from Eontec and others from medical and auto as well. As for me, right now all would like this dice roll to rocket from all areas or any and that includes hope & hype.
And if anyone disagrees with the last statement, then they bought the wrong stock.
Good luck Amigo. Capisce?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
