InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rbd1

04/18/19 1:20 PM

#66354 RE: I-Glow #66352

What are you saying?
Did Chanbond steal the patents or do they own them. I don’t think Chanbond stole anything and surely Chanbond ows the patents.

If Chanbond owns the patents and didn’t steal them, what is then the problem? They are allowed to sell them, lease and even bring to court those who infringe on them. In this country you cannot infringe something on anyone, regardless if you agree or not, the rule of law will be applied as it should be
icon url

cjonez602

04/18/19 1:31 PM

#66357 RE: I-Glow #66352

So the company "chanbond" that created "channel bonding" did not create the patents? LMAO
icon url

stockfan100

04/18/19 1:35 PM

#66358 RE: I-Glow #66352

Only at Fantasyland the reaity of PACER news are replaced by wishful thinking nonsense against the company.
icon url

Goodbuddy4863

04/18/19 4:27 PM

#66362 RE: I-Glow #66352

Correction if You don't mind.

ChanBond has the IPR just like Qualcomm will be getting paid[settlement] to from Apple[Apple has always been a Troll].

The 13 Cable companies[plus Cisco and Arris] trolled to find the IPR to make their DVR boxes work.

Bingo ....they found ChanBond!!