Replies to post #72510 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[Jamis1]

A Nanosys IPO would definitely benefit QMC and Nanoco once they are both commercially successful.

[Jamis1]

Good points.

I was just going to state if QMC or Nanoco made a major win into displays, Nanosys IPO would not benefit.

I think Nanosys would likely try to IPO before then. They likely know where they may be about to lose market share as their current customers would likely be moving on to Nanoco or QMC and Nanosys would likely have wind of the competition moving in before deals are announced for QMC or Nanoco.

Nanosys has been doing a lot more investor education and interviews, in my opinion, this past year. That's exactly what they should be doing before an IPO.

[Kurt_Banoffee]

Nanoco released interim results yesterday. Revenue of L3.4M in first half (vs. 0.2M LY) with a bit more than that contracted in H2. Still operating at an EBITDA loss however.

http://www.nanocotechnologies.com/system/files/uploads/financialdocs/interim-results-presentation-2019.pdf

http://otp.investis.com/clients/uk/nanoco_group_plc/rns/regulatory-story.aspx?cid=1160&newsid=1246426

[trevorbc]

Dupont?
Ah remember this?
http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=176411
Where are the products if Nanoco is such a leader?

Remember when Nanoco couldn't compete with Hansol when pricing was much higher..how in the world can they compete today if qd is apparently $12 a gram. And if they can then why dont they have any products in the market?
Settle down with the Nanoco pump