Try to find in a “major publication” extensive data showing that the authors’ ideas and projections were in error. Doesn’t happen. Scientists don’t take time to put together data-backed arguments or papers that show that they, personally, were in error.
Not gonna happen with a new, “major publication” from Anavex, either. Simply, Anavex has significant new data sets that confirm the various efficacies and safety of Anavex 2-73 in real people with Alzheimer’s — now, over an extended multi-year period.
And, really better to present the information in a journal article; as opposed to a presentation at some distant conference somewhere with a limited number of attendees. With formal publication, the whole world sees the information.