Some here made it very clear that a multi-year audit should take as long as it has. Yet Roger seemed to have know clue of how long this would take. It seems as though he should have consulted some here about timelines. All I'm saying is I will give Roger all the props he deserves. I will also be critical when I feel he is fn up. Whether he reads it here or not is irrelevant. What else are we suppose to discuss here?
It’s not about where the suggestion comes from, it’s about doing what’s logical... 28 million businesses, you got a fight to get noticed.
If you want to see what happens when you do absolutely nothing, just look at the two year chart. 8 figure revenue growth, barely any dilution and no gains.