InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jrt03

03/21/19 7:16 AM

#64859 RE: khenry458 #64858

Thanks Khenry!
icon url

TonyJoe1957

03/21/19 7:30 AM

#64861 RE: khenry458 #64858

Thank you, khenry458!
Good morning all UOIP longs!
Another day closer to good stuff!
AJ
icon url

gooferball

03/21/19 9:53 AM

#64872 RE: khenry458 #64858

Thanks, kh, and morning all!

UOIP 2019
icon url

Goodbuddy4863

03/21/19 12:20 PM

#64911 RE: khenry458 #64858

Updates completed...got to keep them in one sticky post.

No need to answer this...keep up the great work..it is deeply appreciated!!
icon url

shajandr

03/22/19 6:00 PM

#65053 RE: khenry458 #64858

Non-compliance issues are typically if one: exceeds the [age length limits, uses a wrong typeface/font or size, exceeds a margin requirement, doesn't conform to the cover sheet style, omitted page numbering (if required), or any of a dozen or more other formalities. Each jurisdiction has its own rules. For appeals, many jurisdictions require one party to use a red paper for the cover sheet and the other party to use a light blue paper for the cover sheet (if hardcopy is required in addition to electronic filing, which it can be in certain jurisdictions, and bind the briefs in a certain manner.

Most professional quality litigation teams have a junior associate and a paralegal assigned to review all filings before they are submitted to the court so these non-compliance issues don't happen. The associate and paralegal must review for cite-checking, typos, any other writing issues, and to ensure that the document complies with all the rules and requirements of the court to which the submission is to be made.

Getting a notice of non-compliance is an embarrassment and usually means the lawyers are sloppy and don't have a good pre-filing review process and/or they rushed to meet a filing deadline and didn't do a review at all. Bad form.