Thanks for the clarity on decommissioning. Only thing I was suggesting was that an earlier decommissioning would have made James_E's reasoning chronologically invalid.
I still don't buy it, though. There's no way the company would have proven long-term stability that long ago and not said anything about it, or shown more urgency about progress since then.
It would also demonstrate a level of professional foresight that has not previously been shown by this management team. They can't even get something right that they say is six weeks out.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
