InvestorsHub Logo

Jimmy6969

03/14/19 5:37 PM

#185297 RE: tradeherpete #185290

I know what it will be worth in 5 years, if the science proves to be valid. A lot of fricking $!

nidan7500

03/14/19 5:39 PM

#185298 RE: tradeherpete #185290

who really knows what Anavex will be worth in 5 years.


I agree w/this point. I also think it will take at least that long for CNS medical staffers to understand what and how A2-73 (and family) works. Understanding this will become a science unto itself over time.

Einstein is reported to have said:"The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the level of thinking we were at when we created them."

For example, 2019 medical science calls AD after the name of the guy who first defined the symptoms over 100 years ago. Yet Today, the organizations assigned to define an effective solution cannot agree on the cause(s) or symptoms, much less any decent treatments. Billions spent, 1000's dead, 100 years in and we still think that measuring brain mass loss or plaque density is an important piece of information.

Dr.M and the AVXL-SAB appear to be light years ahead of the pack, presenting data and information that the rest of the herd is not yet acknowledged as meaningful, or seemingly able to grasp/agree to. Pathetic. Some one needs their ass kicked.

According to Einstein we should be changing our language and thinking about now. The trials/protocols/thinking/language/confidence levels are all changing. If I can see that from a distance. I am not in the trenches w/massive credentials and research resources and I can see this coming. (It is not about me) Why the hell doesn't the BP community and WS see that? I am mystified and I need a beer. All the best, we got this.