Replies to post #48671 on Vystar Corp (VYST)

[cjstocksup]

Once again awesome VYST DD!

VYST Confirms EMA must buyback 35 Million Shares for Resolution

This particular page per the information within the Court Dockets sums it up for what exactly took place that not only proves that VYST is innocent, but it also confirms that 35,000,000 shares were sold above the authorized or required amount by EMA of which needs to be bought back and given to VYST to return back to their Treasury to rectify the damage that was done
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147380294 .

[pepeoil]

Uhm, sir, the judge is the one that confirms things, not Vyst’s attorneys. Lol. Both sides argue their side, the judge makes the decision

[pepeoil]

It should read vyst argues EMA must buyback 35 million shares. Lol. Attorneys don’t confirm, they argue to the judge, he decides

[DD_dempsey]

BREAK OF .10 coming here - excellent validations

Showing clear proof of institutional investors buying st .15.
Clear proof that share buyback of 35 mil must occur.

Excellent validations coupled with the Corp news and this one is headed back up again as expected.

[wolfden2018]

Isn't that 51 million?

[Frankp]

Thank you Sterling for your continued diligence!

[badshah]

Stervc...something still bothers me about this whole thing...perhaps you or someone else can clear it up, if possible...

As I read this filing, if EMA were not greedy and stopped their conversions as soon as the total proceeds reached $80,976 ($72,300 note + 12% or $8,676 as int.) or 37,350,000 shares, all would be hunky dory...in other words, they would have had 12% of the total O/S of the company !!! Instead, if the judge agrees, they would have to buy back 35,000,000 shares on the open market (?) at say 0.10/share or about $3,5000,000 worth and return the shares to VYST...what I do not understand is that the company was desperate enough to have let these guys possess 12% of the O/S of this company when they only owed them $80,976 !!! For a company with a CEO that boasts his father runs a business with >35 million in annual revenues, this would have been pocket change to pay off BEFORE allowing such a calamity to occur...don't you think ? Something does not compute...of course, if the judge rules favorably for the company now, all is well and good...but this company was in dire straits (worth <700k) as late as Jan. of this year !!!

[badshah]

Also Steve, it is not clear to me that EMA must buy back 35 million shares...from what I read, it was never given those 35 million extra shares and thus there is possibility of a buy back which would of course be at much higher prices...what do you think ?

[spudge]

oh boy. Popcorn Time!