InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

VeronicaFox

03/06/19 2:49 PM

#47429 RE: M000se #47428

What? lol, he ran a PONZI scheme. It’s easy to see by simply reading the case - I’ve included a link below.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1180209.html

icon url

janice shell

03/06/19 3:20 PM

#47440 RE: M000se #47428

hes not guilty so he didnt run it.

That isn't how the law works. The original verdict in his case was reversed on a technicality. I suggest you read the relevant documents. This is what the Ninth Circuit ruled:

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1180209.html

Note that their decision has nothing to do with innocence or guilt. The ruling was based, as are nearly all appellate rulings, on judicial error.

This will explain further:

https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/2005/jun/15/restitution-payments-by-federal-defendant-whose-direct-appeal-was-final-held-not-reimbursable-upon-l/