Replies to post #76621 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[straightword]

You are 100% correct with your statements about the patents and make some other great points. It takes easy logic to figure out. If or until, which appears to be never, VPLM ever monetizes their patents via any infringement judgments then this all means nothing which is where we are and have been for years. You and others like myself have easily figured out the patience is a virtue ruse from Emil and not fallen for this. I feel bad for those that can't see right through this.

[DeerBalls]

I do not understand why the valuation continues to be so troubling: VPLM patents cover communication/applications over one of the most universally owned devices ever created and used by mankind. Hobos on the streets of seattle have mobile phones! Relative few need the new, patented jock-itch or pecker medication!

They are independently valuing these patents at what would be the one of most valuable inventions ever created.

[DeerBalls]

WRONG: VPLM did not go straight to court! VPLM did give notice of infringement and gave the marketplace and opportunity to buy/license/partner! aapl, et al chose the other route, probably figuring VPLM too small to prosecute the patents. Well, a much larger VPLM and an unblemished, 8-0 PTAB record is the result.

Probably the best example exhibiting "it ain't so easy" is VirnetX. They have been in a patent fight with aapl for a bit longer than VPLM. aapl is about to lose hundreds of millions and no one came to partner with VirnetX.

Yet they have not chosen to market these patents, instead going straight to the courts. In my opinion, were these patents as valuable as the company, ceo, and shareholders let on, finding a partner without litigation would be simple. Let the Blue Chip aquiering company pay for litigation. These are the logical steps to not only avoid a long drawn out process that VPLM can not afford without mass dilution. Because this step was not taken, or wasn't an option to be taken, I question the motives behind this litigation.

Oh, almost forgot: PATIENCE IS A VIRTUE

[DeerBalls]

The issue with the claim below is the infringement is ongoing. The infringement damages are ticking up every microsecond!
Yes, the infringement still needs to proven by VPLM, if VPLM has to go that far, but the price/damages have increased far, far faster than any dilution. VPLM holders will be fine!

Again, downside risk is 1x, upside is 15x/20x/90x, or whatever it might become!

If this was settled right away, prior to OS exploding to where it is now, VPLM shareholders would have benefited.